<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for fog of eternity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fogofeternity.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fogofeternity.com</link>
	<description>we make great websites</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:11:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Is It Pointless To Comment On ProBlogger? by Work-Life Balance: Follow Chris Brogan to Anywhen and Improve Your Work Life Fit</title>
		<link>http://www.fogofeternity.com/2009/11/is-it-pointless-to-comment-on-problogger/comment-page-1/#comment-23788</link>
		<dc:creator>Work-Life Balance: Follow Chris Brogan to Anywhen and Improve Your Work Life Fit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fogofeternity.com/?p=949#comment-23788</guid>
		<description>[...] don&#8217;t need to be there&#8230; Sure, I&#8217;d like a reply to that pun I just tweeted, or to be one of the first 16 folks to comment over at ProBlogger, but is any of that really critical? I don&#8217;t think [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] don&#8217;t need to be there&#8230; Sure, I&#8217;d like a reply to that pun I just tweeted, or to be one of the first 16 folks to comment over at ProBlogger, but is any of that really critical? I don&#8217;t think [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on One Joomla! Template, Unlimited Stylesheet Options by Sandy Boone</title>
		<link>http://www.fogofeternity.com/2009/03/one-joomla-template-unlimited-stylesheet-options/comment-page-1/#comment-22617</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Boone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 05:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fogofeternity.com/?p=341#comment-22617</guid>
		<description>Like the concept. Thanks!  Will you have the chance to fix the whole code? (i don&#039;t know php coding) Thanks for spending the time on this and sharing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like the concept. Thanks!  Will you have the chance to fix the whole code? (i don&#8217;t know php coding) Thanks for spending the time on this and sharing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Your In-House Content Management System Is A Con by Ben Morris</title>
		<link>http://www.fogofeternity.com/2009/12/your-in-house-content-management-system-is-a-con/comment-page-1/#comment-22035</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 11:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fogofeternity.com/?p=959#comment-22035</guid>
		<description>The first time anybody approaches content management they often consider writing it in-house, hence the fact that freelance designers will bump in to the occasional bespoke CMS.

Nobody *ever* considers writing content management in-house the second time around.

Custom CMS systems are always a bad idea, without exception. As you point out, it ties you in to a supplier, limits functionality, increases cost, blah, blah, blah. It&#039;s a sign that the developers are clueless, basically.

CMS is difficult enough on an established platform...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first time anybody approaches content management they often consider writing it in-house, hence the fact that freelance designers will bump in to the occasional bespoke CMS.</p>
<p>Nobody *ever* considers writing content management in-house the second time around.</p>
<p>Custom CMS systems are always a bad idea, without exception. As you point out, it ties you in to a supplier, limits functionality, increases cost, blah, blah, blah. It&#8217;s a sign that the developers are clueless, basically.</p>
<p>CMS is difficult enough on an established platform&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Golden Ratio &#8211; A Basic Intro And A Pedantic Question by MumVersusKids</title>
		<link>http://www.fogofeternity.com/2010/01/the-golden-ratio-a-basic-intro-and-a-pedantic-question/comment-page-1/#comment-21875</link>
		<dc:creator>MumVersusKids</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fogofeternity.com/?p=993#comment-21875</guid>
		<description>Oops, published that comment unfinished. Rest of my details duly completed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, published that comment unfinished. Rest of my details duly completed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Golden Ratio &#8211; A Basic Intro And A Pedantic Question by Mum</title>
		<link>http://www.fogofeternity.com/2010/01/the-golden-ratio-a-basic-intro-and-a-pedantic-question/comment-page-1/#comment-21874</link>
		<dc:creator>Mum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fogofeternity.com/?p=993#comment-21874</guid>
		<description>Oooh, a designer after my own geeky heart. I like this whole Golden Ratio concept. 
Personally (and I should clarify that I actually know nothing) I would subtract my margins first and apply the golden ratio to the rest. As you say, the difference is minimal, but the key point is that it&#039;s &lt;i&gt;barely&lt;/i&gt; noticeable, i.e. it IS noticeable. At a glance, the site looks better - I figure whatever calculations you use, you&#039;ll find one that happens to explain what you think is naturally more appealing! If you&#039;ve never read Blink (malcolm gladwell), you should.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oooh, a designer after my own geeky heart. I like this whole Golden Ratio concept.<br />
Personally (and I should clarify that I actually know nothing) I would subtract my margins first and apply the golden ratio to the rest. As you say, the difference is minimal, but the key point is that it&#8217;s <i>barely</i> noticeable, i.e. it IS noticeable. At a glance, the site looks better &#8211; I figure whatever calculations you use, you&#8217;ll find one that happens to explain what you think is naturally more appealing! If you&#8217;ve never read Blink (malcolm gladwell), you should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
