<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Wish I&#8217;d Designed&#8230; The Dollar Dreadful</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fogofeternity.com/2009/10/i-wish-id-designed-the-dollar-dreadful/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fogofeternity.com/2009/10/i-wish-id-designed-the-dollar-dreadful/</link>
	<description>we make great websites</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 02:59:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nathanael</title>
		<link>http://www.fogofeternity.com/2009/10/i-wish-id-designed-the-dollar-dreadful/comment-page-1/#comment-26560</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathanael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 23:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fogofeternity.com/?p=896#comment-26560</guid>
		<description>Have you checked out http://www.fisticuffdesign.com ? While it doesn&#039;t capture the Victorian-era newspaper look-n-feel quite as exquisitely as does Dollar Dreadful, it does offer a good-looking vintage design with dynamic content. The only thing I would change is its 800px fixed width. Really, who doesn&#039;t run at least 1024 these days? And on my 1366x768 widescreen laptop display the site looks a bit lost at sea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you checked out <a href="http://www.fisticuffdesign.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.fisticuffdesign.com</a> ? While it doesn&#8217;t capture the Victorian-era newspaper look-n-feel quite as exquisitely as does Dollar Dreadful, it does offer a good-looking vintage design with dynamic content. The only thing I would change is its 800px fixed width. Really, who doesn&#8217;t run at least 1024 these days? And on my 1366&#215;768 widescreen laptop display the site looks a bit lost at sea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

